فصلنامه علمی کارافن

فصلنامه علمی کارافن

طراحی مدل شایستگی‌های کارآفرینی سازمانی در دیوان محاسبات کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (توسعه ای)

نویسندگان
1 گروه کارآفرینی، واحد علی آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی آباد کتول، ایران.
2 گروه مدیریت، واحد علی آباد کتول، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، علی آباد کتول، ایران.
چکیده
این پژوهش با هدف طراحی مدل شایستگی‌های کارآفرینی سازمانی در دیوان محاسبات کشور انجام شد. با توجه به تحولات پرشتاب محیطی و افزایش انتظارات جامعه برای خدمات کارآمدتر، سازمان‌های بخش عمومی نیازمند پرورش روحیه کارآفرینی و نوآوری هستند. اما ماهیت خاص دیوان محاسبات که بر پایه دقت، قانونمداری و اجتناب از ریسک‌های غیرضروری استوار است، توسعه چنین رویکردی را به امری پیچیده تبدیل کرده است. این تحقیق با رویکرد آمیخته اکتشافی انجام شد. در بخش کیفی، با 15 خبره مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته عمیق انجام شد. داده‌های کیفی با استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمون تحلیل شدند که منجر به شناسایی 82 کد محوری در قالب هشت دسته اصلی شایستگی گردید. در مرحله کمّی، با استفاده از روش دلفی فازی و توزیع پرسشنامه، شاخص‌ها و شایستگی‌ها توسط خبرگان مورد ارزیابی و تأیید نهایی قرار گرفتند. تحلیل داده‌ها منجر به طراحی مدل جامع شایستگی‌های کارآفرینی سازمانی در هشت بعد اصلی شد که شامل شایستگی‌های شناختی و راهبردی، شایستگی‌های رفتاری و شخصیتی، شایستگی‌های اخلاقی، ارزشی و حاکمیتی، شایستگی‌های رهبری و مدیریتی، شایستگی‌های تعاملاتی و شبکه‌سازی، شایستگی‌های شناسایی فرصت و نوآوری، شایستگی‌های فناورانه و داده‌محور و شایستگی‌های فنی-تخصصی، می‌باشند. نتایج نشان داد کارآفرینی سازمانی اثرگذار در نهادهای حاکمیتی نیازمند ترکیبی ویژه از شایستگی‌هاست که میان نوآوری و پایبندی به قوانین، پیشگامی و پاسخگویی، و گرایش به تغییر و ثبات تعادل برقرار می‌کند. مدل ارائه‌شده، می‌تواند به عنوان چارچوبی بنیادین در سامانه مدیریت منابع انسانی دیوان محاسبات کشور در زمینه‌های انتخاب و جذب، آموزش و توسعه، ارزیابی عملکرد و جانشین‌پروری مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Designing a Competency Model for Corporate Entrepreneurship at the Supreme Audit Court of Iran

نویسندگان English

Mohammadreza Sharahi 1
behrad shahrabi 1
Hadi Sanaeepour 2
1 Department of Entrepreneurship, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran.
2 Department of Management, Aliabad Katoul Branch, Islamic Azad University, Aliabad Katoul, Iran.
چکیده English

This research was conducted with the objective of designing a model of organizational entrepreneurship competencies for the Supreme Audit Court of Iran (SAC), as a governmental and supervisory institution. In light of rapid environmental transformations and the increasing expectations of society for more efficient services, public sector organizations are in need of nurturing an entrepreneurial and innovative spirit. However, the specific nature of the Supreme Audit Court, which is grounded in precision, adherence to law, and the avoidance of unnecessary risks, has rendered the development of such an approach a complex undertaking. This study was carried out using an exploratory mixed-methods approach, employing both qualitative and quantitative analyses. In the qualitative phase, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 experts (including university professors, senior and middle managers of the Court, and experienced specialists). The qualitative data were analyzed using the thematic analysis method, which led to the identification of 82 core codes categorized into eight main competency groups. In the quantitative phase, utilizing the Fuzzy Delphi method and the distribution of questionnaires, the indicators and competencies were evaluated and finalized by the experts. Data analysis resulted in the design of a comprehensive model of organizational entrepreneurship competencies across eight principal dimensions. These dimensions were determined as follows: cognitive and strategic competencies; behavioral and personality competencies; ethical, value-based, and governance competencies; leadership and managerial competencies; interactional and networking competencies; opportunity identification and innovation competencies, technological and data-driven competencies; and technical-specialized competencies.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Corporate Entrepreneurship
Competency Model
Supreme Audit Court of Iran
Governance Institutions
Human Resource Management
Antončič, B., & Auer Antončič, J. (2023). Psychological determinants of entrepreneurial intentions and behaviors; contributions of Robert D. Hisrich to the field of entrepreneurship. Frontiers in psychology14, 1196889.
Arribas-Aguila, D., Castaño, G., & Martínez-Arias, R. (2024). A systematic review of evidence-based general competency models: Development of a general competencies taxonomy. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 40(2), 61–76.
Baawain, A. M., Laachach, A., Jaboob, A. S., & Kankaew, K. (2025). Uncovering the catalysts of sustainable business performance: Digital orientation, entrepreneurial competency, and strategic change. Business Strategy & Development, 8(1), Article e70070.
Bau, F., & Wagner, K. (2015). Measuring corporate entrepreneurship culture. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 25(2), 231–244.
Bernado, E., & Bratzke, F. (2024). Revisiting EntreComp through a systematic literature review of entrepreneurial competences: Implications for entrepreneurship education and future research. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(3), Article 101010.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1991). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. John Wiley & Sons.
Brétéché, B., & Swarbrick, A. (2024). Increasing the impact of supreme audit institutions through external engagement. SIGMA Papers.
Campbell, J. W. (2025). Job autonomy, role ambiguity, and procedural justice: A multi-conditional process model of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 45(1), 145–171.
Ceki, B., & Moloi, T. (2025). Technology adoption framework for supreme audit institutions within the hybrid TAM and TOE model. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), Article 409.
Covin, J. G., & Wales, W. J. (2019). Crafting high-impact entrepreneurial orientation research: Some suggested guidelines. Entrepreneurship theory and practice43(1), 3-18.
D’Angelo, S., Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., & Di Lorenzo, F. (2024). Understanding corporate entrepreneurship in the digital age: A review and research agenda. Review of Managerial Science, 18(12), 3719–3774.
Danni, L. S., Grzesiak, S. A., Freitas, C. A. S., Dumitrescu, O. C., Holezek, A., Kennedy-O'Brien, A., ... & Rizk, A. M. A. (2025). Foresight and Supreme Audit Institutions: Navigating Global Trends. International Journal of Government Auditing52(2), 48-52.
Demircioglu, M. A., & Chowdhury, F. (2021). Entrepreneurship in public organizations: The role of leadership behavior. Small Business Economics, 57(3), 1107–1123.
Dionisijev, I., & Bozhinovska Lazarevska, Z. (2025). Enhancing sustainable progress: An analysis of supreme audit institutions’ performance audits and information disclosure practices. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 37(2), 254–272.
Fundamental, I. S. N., Auditors, S. A. I., Cooperation, I. D., INTOSAI, I., Update, I. D. I., & Calendar, I. N. T. O. S. A. I. (2013). www. intosaijournal. org.
García-Morales, V. J., Llorens-Montes, F. J., & Verdú-Jover, A. J. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of organizational innovation and organizational learning in entrepreneurship. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(1), 21–42.
Girma Aragaw, Z., Haag, K., & Baù, M. (2025). Contextualizing corporate entrepreneurship: A systematic review and future research agenda. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 37(1–2), 1–37.
INTOSAI, I. (2018). WGPD ANNUAL EVENT FOCUSES ON MAJOR PROJECTS, PROGRESS. International Journal of Government Auditing, 38.
Kontogeorga, G. (2021). Supreme audit institutions. In Encyclopedia of law and economics (pp. 1–5). Springer.
Kovid, R. K., Bhati, B., & Sharma, G. M. (2025). Entrepreneurial competencies, institutional voids and performance of small and medium enterprises: Evidence from an emerging economy. Vision, 29(1), 81–90.
Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Hayton, J. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship: The innovative challenge for a new global economic reality. Small Business Economics, 45(2), 245–253.
Lajçi, R. (2025). Measures of individual-level intrapreneurship: A scoping review. Review of Managerial Science, 1–33.
Mai, K. N., & Thai, Q. H. (2024). Entrepreneurial competencies: A systematic literature review. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1–77.
Mitchelmore, S., & Rowley, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial competencies: A literature review and development agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 16(2), 92–111.
Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation. South-Western Educational Publishing.
Olumekor, M. (2024). Towards an evidence-based consensus on the impact of public sector entrepreneurship on public administration. Management Review Quarterly, 1–33.
Orozco, J., Turro, A., & Urbano, D. (2024). Research on corporate entrepreneurship in developing countries: A review and agenda for future directions. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 14(4), 1735–1779.
Sakib, M. N., Rabbani, M. R., Hawaldar, I. T., Jabber, M. A., Hossain, J., & Sahabuddin, M. (2022). Entrepreneurial competencies and SMEs’ performance in a developing economy. Sustainability, 14(20), Article 13643.
Talebpour, M., Keshtidar, M., & Golgoli, M. (2023). Providing a model for the development of strategic entrepreneurship in sports organizations. Research in Sport Management and Marketing, 4(3), 29–43. (In Persian).
Treanor, L., Noke, H., Marlow, S., & Mosey, S. (2021). Developing entrepreneurial competences in biotechnology early career researchers to support long-term entrepreneurial career outcomes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164, Article 120031.
Urbaniec, M. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurship: Innovation-related activities in European enterprises. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(4), 1773–1779.
Vivona, R., Clausen, T. H., Gullmark, P., Cinar, E., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2025). Public sector entrepreneurship: An integrative review. Small Business Economics, 64(4), 1791–1815.
دوره 23، شماره 2
علوم انسانی
تابستان 1405

  • تاریخ دریافت 13 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 آبان 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 02 دی 1404