بررسی ملات ژئوپلیمری حاوی مواد فراک و الیاف هیبریدی با درصدهای مختلف

کاشفی, بردیا; قاسم زاده موسوی نژاد, سید حسین

doi:10.48301/kssa.2025.468749.2947

بررسی ملات ژئوپلیمری حاوی مواد فراک و الیاف هیبریدی با درصدهای مختلف

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کاربردی)

نویسندگان

بردیا کاشفی ¹

سید حسین قاسم زاده موسوی نژاد ²

¹ دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه عمران، دانشکده فنی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

² دانشیار، گروه مهندسی عمران، دانشکده فنی، دانشگاه گیلان، رشت، ایران.

10.48301/kssa.2025.468749.2947

چکیده

در جهت توسعه پایدار و کاهش تولید گازهای گلخانه‌ای ناشی از سیمان پرتلند محققین مصالح ترکیبی نوینی را به عنوان جایگزینی برای سیمان پرتلند معرفی کردند. همچون ژئوپلیمرها و فراک که ترکیبی از مواد بازیافتی می باشد و بجای انتشار کربن دی اکسید آن را به خود جذب کرده و به همین دلیل دوست دار محیط زیست می‌باشد. یکی دیگر از راه های رسیدن به مقاومت‌ فشاری و سایشی و حتی کششی بالا استفاده از الیاف در بتن است. در این تحقیق نیز تلاش شده است تا با افزودن مواد فراک به میزان 10 تا 40 درصد وزن سرباره به طرح بهینه ملات ژئوپلیمری پایه سرباره و حاوی الیاف شیشه و پلی‌پروپلین طرح بهینه به دست آید. نتایج به دست آمده از این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که با گذشت سن نمونه‌ها مقاومت فشاری طرح حاوی مواد فراک و الیاف هیبریدی افزایش 26.6 درصد نسبت به نمونه‌های بدون الیاف خواهد داشت. همچنین 0.5 درصد الیاف شیشه دربرابر ضربه 84.6 درصد مقاومت بهتری نسبت به 0.5 درصد الیاف پلی‌پروپلین داشته و در برابر کشش، نسبت به طرح هیبریدی 23.1 درصد عملکرد بهتری نشان داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

ملات ژئوپلیمری

الیاف هیبریدی

فراک

سرباره

الیاف شیشه

الیاف پلی‌پروپلین

موضوعات

مهندسی عمران(سازه و زلزله )

عنوان مقاله English

Study of geopolymer mortar containing Ferrock materials and hybrid fibers in different ratios

نویسندگان English

Bardia Kashefi ¹

seyed Hosein Ghasemzadeh Mosavinejad ²

¹ M.Sc. student of Civil Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical Faculty, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

² Associate professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Technical Faculty, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran.

چکیده English

In the direction of sustainable development and Reduction of greenhouse gases caused by Portland cement production, scientists have introduced various alternatives to traditional Portland cement, including Geopolymers and Ferrock, which is made from recycled materials and is carbon-negative, meaning it absorbs carbon dioxide. As a result, it is considered an environmentally friendly material. Additionally, incorporating Fibers into concrete can enhance its compressive, tensile, and erosion resistance. This study conducted experiments by adding Ferrock materials in amounts ranging from 10% to 40% to a slag-based geopolymer, using glass and polypropylene Fibers to determine the optimal mix. The results indicated that the compressive strength of samples containing Ferrock, and hybrid Fibers increased by 26.6% over time compared to samples without Fibers. It was also concluded that Glass Fibers exhibit 84.6% greater impact load strength than polypropylene Fibers at 0.5 percent and have a 23.1% higher flexural strength in comparison to hybrid Fiber samples. In this study, searches were carried out by adding Ferrock from 10 to 40 percent to slag-based geopolymer with glass and polypropylene fibers to find an optimal mix. Results show that the compressive strength of samples that include Ferrock and hybrid fibers increased by 26.6 percent over time in comparison to samples without fibers. It was also concluded that glass fibers have better strength against impact load than polypropylene fibers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Geopolymer mortar

hybrid fibers

Ferrock

, slag

glass fibers

polypropylene fibers

[1] Maslyk, M., Gäb, T., Matveeva, G. N., Opitz, P., Mondeshki, M., Krysiak, Y., Kolb, U., & Tremel, W. (2021). Multistep crystallization pathways in the Ambient‐Temperature synthesis of a new Alkali‐Activated binder. Advanced Functional Materials, 32(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202108126.

[2] Kim, T. H., Chae, C., Kim, G. H., & Jang, H. J. (2016). Analysis of CO2 emission characteristics of concrete used at construction sites. Sustainability, 8(4), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8040348.

[3] Davidovits, J. (2013). Geopolymer Cement a review. Geopolymer Science and Technics, Technical Paper #21, Geopolymer Institute Library. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph-Davidovits/publication/306946529_Geopolymer_Cement_a_review_2013/links/5bf2cb7c299bf1124fde4512/Geopolymer-Cement-a-review-2013.pdf.

[4] Lanuza, A., Achaiah, A. T., Bello, J., & Donovan, T. (2017) Ferrock. https://www.academia.edu/download/101231063/USC-Ferrock-Final-Paper-4.24.17.pdf.

[5] Prashanth, M., Gokul, & Shanmugasundaram, M. (2019). Investigation on Ferrock based mortar an environment friendly concrete. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3461209.

[6] Niveditha, M., Manjunath, Y. M., & Prasanna, S. (2020). Ferrock: A Carbon Negative Sustainable Concrete. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 90–98. https://penerbit.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/IJSCET/article/download/8084/4103.

[7] Singh, K. (2020). compressive strength study of green concrete by using ferrock. Multidisciplinary International Research Journal of Gujarat Technological University, 2(2). https://www.gtu.ac.in/GTU-ResearchJournals/News/5%20Engineering.pdf.

[8] Vijayan, D. S., Dineshkumar, Sivasuriyan, A., & Janarthanan, T. S. (2020). Evaluation of ferrock: A greener substitute to cement. Materials Today: Proceedings, 22, 781–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.10.147.

[9] Agarwal, S., & Jaysawal, D. (2023). Ferrock Material: a case study. International Journal of Research in Civil Engineering and Technology, 4(2), 1–3. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Devesh-Jaysawal/publication/373195323_Ferrock_material_A_case_study/links/64df2da4caf5ff5cd0c3f309/Ferrock-material-A-case-study.pdf.

[10] Pravitha, J. J., Merina, R. N., & Subash, N. (2023). Mechanical properties and microstructural characterization of ferrock as CO2–negative material in self compacting concrete. Construction & Building Materials, 396, 132289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132289.

[11] Aswani, E., & Karthi, L. (2017). A literature review on fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res, 8(2), 408. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lathi-Karthi/publication/315790514_A_Literature_Review_on_Fiber_Reinforced_Geopolymer_Concrete/links/58e522f5aca2727858c91b45/A-Literature-Review-on-Fiber-Reinforced-Geopolymer-Concrete.pdf.[12] Abbas, S. N., Qureshi, M. I., Abid, M. M., Zia, A., & Tariq, M. A. U. R. (2022). An Investigation of mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymer and glass fibers concrete. Sustainability, 14(17), 10489. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su141710489.

[13] Güler, S., & Akbulut, Z. F. (2023). The single and hybrid use of steel and basalt fibers on high‐temperature resistance of sustainable ultra‐high performance geopolymer cement mortars. Structural Concrete, 24(2), 2402–2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202201026.

[14] ASTM Standard C33 (2003). Specification for concrete aggregates, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003, https://www.astm.org/c0033-03.htm .

[15] ASTM Standard C109/C109M-11 (2011). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Specimens), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/c0109_c0109m-11.html.

[16] ASTM Standard C348-21 (2021). Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Hydraulic-Cement Mortars, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/c0348-21.html.

[17] ASTM Standard C948 (2023). Standard Test Method for Dry and Wet Bulk Density, Water Absorption, and Apparent Porosity of Thin Sections of Glass-Fiber Reinforced Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/c0948-81r23.html.

[18] ASTM Standard C1876-19 (2019). Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Resistivity or Bulk Conductivity of Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://www.astm.org/c1876-19.html.

[19] ASTM Standard C597-22 (2022). Standard Test Method for Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, DOI:10.1520/ C0597-22. https://www.astm.org/c0597-22.html.

[20] Rahman, M., Usman, M., & Al-Ghalib, A. (2012). Fundamental properties of rubber modified self-compacting concrete (RMSCC). Construction & Building Materials, 36, 630–637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.116.

[21] ACI Committee. (1978). Measurement of properties of fiber reinforced concrete. ACI Journal, 75(7). https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&ID=10941.

[22] Karthika, S., Rose, A. L., & Priyadarshini, G. (2021, October). Sustainable Development on Ferrock Mortar Cubes. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (2040,1,012020).IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012020/meta.

[23] Salimbahrami, S. R., Shakeri, R., & Habibi Hajikolae, B. (2021). Proposed Mix Design of Recycled Concrete Used in Urban Concrete Tables Using Neural Network.Karafan Journal. https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2021.128404. (in persian)

[24] Golewski, G. L. (2023). Assessing of water absorption on concrete composites containing fly ash up to 30 % in regards to structures completely immersed in water, Case Studies in Construction Materials, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02337.

[25] Moharrer, A. (2023). Investigating the Effect of Silica Fume Waste Powder of Sand Blasting as Cement Replacement in the Rheological and Mechanical Properties of Concrete. Karafan Journal. https://karafan.tvu.ac.ir/article_178547.html. (in persian)

[26] Wilson, M. L., & Tennis, P. D. (2021). Design and control of concrete

mixtures. Portland Cement Association. https://books.google.com/books/about/Design_and_Control_of_Concrete_Mixtures.html?id=61yDzwEACAAJ.

[27] Wazien, A. W., Abdullah, M. M. A. B., Razak, R. A., Rozainy, M. M. R., & Tahir, M. F. M. (2016). Strength and density of geopolymer mortar cured at ambient temperature for use as repair material. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (133,1,012042). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/133/1/012042/meta.

[28] Hasani, S. M. R., & Nematzadeh, M. (2022). Compressive Behavior and Durability of Concrete Containing Waste Aggregates as A Replacement of Coarse Aggregates and Marble Powder as a Replacement of Cement. Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal, 19(1), 83-105. https://karafan.tvu.ac.ir/article_147492.html?lang=en . (in persian)

[29] Whitehurst, E. A., (1951). Soniscope tests on concrete structures. Journal of American concrete institute, 47, 443-444. https://www.concrete.org/publications /internationalconcreteabstractsportal/m/details/id/12004.

[30] Pawar, M. S., Shirsat, A. K., & Bhalchandra, S. A. (2021). Impact resistance of glass fiber reinforced concrete. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol, 8, 3441-3445. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.24480.71686.