تبیین و سنجش مؤلفه‌های کیفیت‌بخشی به فرایند طراحی معماری بر پایۀ استعاره‌های مفهومی به روش ترکیبی (موردپژوهی: کارگاه طراحی معماری 3-دانشگاه فنی و حرفه‌ای)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کاربردی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری تخصصی معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه معماری، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه هنر، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

10.48301/kssa.2023.402330.2608

چکیده

همگام با تحول نظریه‌پردازی‌ها در باب فرایند طراحی معماری، آفرینش طرح‌مایه به‌ عنوان بخش مهمی از این فرایند پیچیده، همواره در ادبیات طراحی‌پژوهی موردتوجه قرار گرفته است؛ بنابراین آموزش تفکر معمارانه و تقویت مفهوم‌پردازی به ‌موازات جریان اصلی آموزش طراحی و دانش معماری ضرورت دارد. اگرچه در این حوزه، پژوهش‌های قابل‌توجه صورت‌گرفته است ولی پاسخ‌گوی کاربردی نمودن فرایند طراحی متناسب با مهارت‌های لازم برای ورود به حرفۀ معماری نیست. این پژوهش می‌کوشد از طریق مطالعات بین‌رشته‌ای و با هدف توسعۀ کیفی آموزش فرایند طراحی معماری به کیفیت‌بخشی با استمداد از استعاره‌های مفهومی و رویکرد ترکیبی بپردازد. در بخش کیفی بر پایۀ تحلیل محتوای منابع علمی و استدلال منطقی، 4 مؤلفۀ «جست ‌و جوی مفاهیم ذهنی متناسب با موضوع طراحی، تشخیص و انتخاب مفاهیم، تناسب طرح‌مایۀ معماری با مفاهیم انتخابی و پرورش طرح‌مایه»، استخراج شده و مدل مفهومی پژوهش را شکل می‌دهد. سپس بر مبنای این مدل به روش اقدام‌پژوهی یک تمرین در کارگاه طراحی معماری 3 اجرا شد و توسط سه داور خبره مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. این داده‌ها در بخش کمی به روش آزمون t مستقل و نرم‌افزار spss ویراست 26 تحلیل شد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد کاربرد استعاره‌های مفهومی در آموزش فرایند طراحی معماری، سودمند است و این جابه‌جایی ذهنی از حوزۀ معماری به حوزۀ ادبیات با کیفیت‌بخشی به فرایند طراحی ارتباط معنادار دارد. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش، تأیید می‌نماید که روش پیشنهادی هم در ساختاربخشی به مسئلۀ طراحی و هم در دستیابی به طرح‌مایۀ متناسب با 4مؤلفۀ مذکور به صورتی قابل‌توجه تأثیرگذار است. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining the Qualitative Structure to the Architectural Design Process based on Conceptual Metaphors in a Mixed Method

نویسندگان [English]

  • Somayeh Davoodi 1
  • Razieh Labibzadeh 2
  • Nayer Tahoori 3
1 PhD Student in Architecture, Science and Research, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Architecture, Science and Research, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Department of Art, Science and Research, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Along with the evolution of theories about the architectural design process, the creation of the concept as an important part of this complex process has always been considered in design research. Therefore, it is necessary to teach architectural conceptualization in parallel with the teaching of design skills and architectural knowledge. Although significant research has been conducted in this field, it is not sufficient to apply the design process in accordance with the necessary skills of the architectural profession. From an interdisciplinary way, this research attempts to improve the quality of the architectural design process with reference to conceptual metaphors in a mixed approach. In the qualitative part, based on the analysis of scientific sources and logical reasoning, 4 components of searching for mental concepts, identifying and choosing concepts, matching the architectural concept with selected concepts and developing the concept form the conceptual structure of the research. Then, based on this structure, an exercise was implemented in the 3rd architectural workshop and evaluated by three expert judges. Data was analyzed quantitatively by independent t-test method and SPSS software version 26. The findings showed that using conceptual metaphors in the teaching of the architectural design process is beneficial, and this mental shift from architecture to literature has a meaningful relationship with the quality of the design process. The results of the research confirm that the proposed method is significantly effective both in structuring the design problem and in achieving a concept that fits the 4 mentioned components.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Architectural Design Process
  • Concept
  • Conceptual Metaphor
  • Combined Research

مراجع

[1] Technicaland Vocational University. (2022, May). Road map of technical and vocational university transformation. https://tvu.ac.ir/fa/605857
[2] Mirzadeh Maragheh, K., Oladian, M., & Imani, M. N. (2022). Providing a Model for Improving the Performance of Technical and Vocational Universities Based on Educational Needs Until 2030 in Iran. Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal, 19(Special Issue), 13-42. https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2022.299390.1669
[3] Keykha, A., Abdollahi, H., & Khorsandi, A. (2019). Identifying the Factors Affecting the Quality of Education from the Viewpoint of Higher Education Specialists and Ph.D. Students. Journal of Management and Planning In Educational System, 12(1), 151-182. https://doi.org/10.29252/mpes.12.1.151
[4] Bazargan Harandi, A. (2019). Educational evaluation: concepts, models and operational process (18 ed.). Samt. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11663749
[5] Rezaei, H., Keramati, G., & Dehbashi Sharif, M. (2018). A Psychological Meta-Analysis of the Form-Function Relation in Architectural Design Process from the Perspective of Creativity. Journal ofInnovation and Creativity in Human Science, 8(2), 265-298. http://sanad.iau.ir/fa/Article/929514
[6] Technicaland Vocational University. (2022). Curriculum of the continuous bachelor's course in architecture in Technical and Vocational University. https://tvu.ac.ir/fa/page/36981
[7] Nadimi, H., Sharifzadeh, S., & Tabatabaei, Z. (2019). The Roles of Narrative Thinking and its Potentials for Architecture Education at Design Studios. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 24(1), 85-100. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2019 .273542.672198
[8] Ansari, H. (2009). processors and generators in architectural disign process. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 1(39), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfa up.2018.68315
[9] Shariatrad, F., & Mahdavipour, H. (2009). Evaluation of design 4 studio’s role in professional abilities of Yazd University graduates in architecture. Honar–ha–ye–Ziba, 36, 49-57. https://journals.ut.ac.ir/article_27348.html
[10] Tahvildari, H., Ghobadian, V., & Afhami, R. (2019). The Relationship between Metacognitive beliefs and undergraduate student’s architectural design courses score (Case study: Architectural design 5 students). Hoviatshahr, 4(12), 35-46. http://sanad.iau.ir/en/A rticle/793735
[11] Beyti, H., Gharehbaglou, M., & Nazarzadeh Ansaroudi, E. (2021). Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Approved Housing Education Program (Architecture Studio 5) Based on the Expectations of the Professional Community of Architecture Graduates A Case Study of the Professional Community in Tabriz. Journal of Architecture and Urban Planning, 14(33), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.30480/aup.2021.3316.1697
[12] Tayyah, S., Mehdizadeh Saradj, F., & Mahmoodi Zarandi, M. (2021). Developing a Nature-Inspired Model of Creativity in Architectural Design for Novice Learners. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 18(100), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh. 2021.258840.4722
[13] Mahmoodi, S. A. S., & Zakeri, S. M. H. (2011). Influence of Design Precedents on Creativity. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 3(47), 39-50. https://jfaup.ut. ac.ir/article_28929.html?lang=en
[14] Karbasi, A. (2012). Steps in Architectural Education: an Experience. Soffeh, 21(3), 17-26. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100361.html?lang=en
[15] Mahmoudi, S. A. S. (1999). Teaching the process of architectural design to use students' latent talents. Honar-ha-ye Ziba, 4 & 5(0), 73-81. https://jhz.ut.ac.ir/article_17132.html
[16] Kazemi, E., Sattari Sarebangoli, H., Mohammadzade, R., & Gharibpur, A. (2021). Studying the quality of teaching the course of the Introduction to architectural design (2) at the Faculty of Fine Arts, University of Tehran. Technology of Education Journal 15(4), 815-835. https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2019.4830.2124
[17] Nasser Khaki, H., & Noorian, P. (2012). Representing a Design Process Model. Soffeh, 21(3), 57-64. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100366.html
[18] Hojat, I. (2004). Creative Education: A New Experience. Honar-ha-ye-ziba, (18), 25-36. https://www.sid.ir/paper/5757/en
[19] Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the Synthesis of Form (9 ed.). Harvard University Press. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/books/9780674627512
[20] Archer, L. B. (1965). Systematic method for designers. Council of Industrial Design. htt ps://search.worldcat.org/title/2108433
[21] Jones, J. C. (1970). Design Methods: Seeds of Human Futures. Wiley-Interscience. https ://books.google.com/books?id=W5NRAAAAMAAJ
[22] Broadbent, G. (1973). Design in Architecture: Architecture and the Human Sciences. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books?id=DAlQAAAAMAAJ
[23] Cross, N. (Ed). (1984). Developments in design methodology. John Wiley & Sons. https: //www.amazon.com/Developments-Design-Methodology-Nigel-Cross/dp/0471102482
[24] Lang, J. T. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company. https://books.google.c om/books?id=lHlwQgAACAAJ
[25] Salama, A. (1995). New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the Design Studio. Tailored Text & Unlimited Potential Publishing. https://books.google.com/books?i d=J0HzIyF8RfkC
[26] Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (4 ed.). University of Chicago Press. https://www.amazon.com/Structure-Scientific-Revolutions-50th-Anniversar y/dp/0226458121
[27] Gorji Mahlabani, Y. (2007). Design thinking and its process patterns. Soffeh, 16(2), 106-123. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100468.html?lang=en
[28] Lawson, B. (2005). How designers think (4 ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978 0080454979
[29] Rezaei, M. (2014). Design Analytica: reviewing theories and concepts in contemporary design process of form and space Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch. https://ctb.iau.ir/faculty/m-rezaei-urban/fa/book/1
[30] Darke, J. (1979). The primary generator and the design process. Design Studies, 1(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(79)90027-9
[31] McGinty, T. (1979). Concepts in architecture. In J. C. Snyder & A. J. Catanese (Eds.), Introduction to Architecture. McGraw-Hill. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper /Introduction-to-architecture-Snyder-Catanese/28839ffd4cc629ae671071c2f46a4c 856fddb4fc
[32] Lawson, B. (1980). How Designers Think. Architectural Press. https://books.google.com /books?id=AKtZAAAAYAAJ
[33] Laseau, P. (2000). Graphic Thinking for Architects and Designers (3 ed.). Wiley. https:// books.google.com/books?id=KRCyqDjYSlAC
[34] Schon, D. A. (1984). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books. https://books.google.com/books?id=ceJIWay4-jgC
[35] Duerk, D. P. (1993). Architectural Programming: Information Management for Design. Wiley. https://books.google.com/books?id=qIdQAAAAMAAJ
[36] Jencks, C. (2002). The New Paradigm in Architecture: The Language of Post-modernism. Yale University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=20bkru0gzCMC
[37] Nadimi, H. (2000). An inquiry into the design process. Soffeh, 9(29), 71-84. https://sid.ir/ paper/440319/en
[38] Snyder, J. C., & Catanese, A. J. (1979). Introduction to Architecture. McGraw-Hill. http s://books.google.com/books?id=kE1QAAAAMAAJ
[39] Davoodi, S., & Ayatollahi, M. H. (2008). What is a metaphor and how does it affect the production of a concept? Soffeh, 17(47), 17-26. https://www.sid.ir/paper/94273/en
[40] Mandegari, K., Nadimi, H., Mahdavipoor, H., & Davoodi, S. (2012). Identifying Design Concept Components. Soffeh, 21(2), 43-52. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100351. html?lang=en
[41] Sharif, H. R., & Nadimi, H. (2013). Ideation versus Idea Processing in Architectural Design Thinking. Soffeh, 23(3), 19-26. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100209.html?lang=en
[42] Panahi, S., Hashempour, R., & Islami, S. G. (2014). The Mind Architecture, From The “Idea” To The “Concept”. Hoviateshahr 8(17), 25-34. https://sanad.iau.ir/en/Journa l/hoviatshahr/Article/795323
[43] Kalami, M., & Nadimi, H. (2014). Tacit Knowing and Primary Generators Reflections on the Role of Tacit Knowing in Formation of Primary Design Generators. Soffeh, 24(1), 19-32. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100222.html?lang=en
[44] Bastani, M., & Mahmoodi, S. A. S. (2018). Conceptualization Methods in the Design Process of Architecture. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 23(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2018.238916.671776
[45] Shariatrad, F., & Pourabrishami, P. (2021). Sources of Architectural Ideation and the Contribution of Each in the Design Process of َArchitects and Architecture Students (Case study: Architecture students of Shahid Beheshti University). Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 26(1), 69-77. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup. 2022.310743.672533
[46] Hillier, B., & Leaman, A. (1976). Architecture as a discipline. Journal of Architectural Research, 5(1), 28-32. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43474204
[47] Nadimi, H., & Shariat Rad, F. (2012). Sources of Architectural Design Ideation A Reflection on the Ideation Process of Eight Iranian Professional Architects. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 17(2), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2012.3 0155
[48] Labibzadeh, R., Hamzenejad, M., & Khanmohammadi, M. A. (2017). Evaluation of Architectural Design Expressing Models for the Enhancement of the Position of Content in Them. Journal of Iranian Architecture & Urbanism, 8(2), 17-31. https://doi.org/1 0.30475/isau.2018.62062
[49] Hawkes, T. (1972). Metaphor. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Metaphor/Hawke s/p/book/9781138238121
[50] Smith, P. F. (2003). The dynamics of delight: Architecture and aesthetics. Routledge. ht tps://doi.org/10.4324/9780203401897
[51] Kazazi, M. J. (2016). Figures of Speech: Expression (Volume 1) (11 ed.). Nashre Markaz. https://www.gisoom.com/book/11114630
[52] Mohammadi, A., & Tafazzoli, Z. (2018). Design As … A Re-Reading of ‘Design’s’ Conceptual Metaphors. Soffeh, 28(4), 5-24. https://soffeh.sbu.ac.ir/article_100450.html?lang=en
[53] Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=r6nOYYtxzUoC
[54] Coyne, R., Snodgrass, A., & Martin, D. (1994). Metaphors in the Design Studio. Journal of Architectural Education, 48(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1994 .10734630
[55] Casakin, H. P. (2007). Factors of metaphors in design problem-solving: Implications for design creativity. International journal of design, 1(2), 21-33. https://www.ijdesign. org/index.php/IJDesign/article/view/53
[56] Manavirad, M., & Madadi, S. (2021). Visual Representation of Metaphors in Urban Billboards. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 17(93), 93-104. https://doi.org/10. 22034/bagh.2020.226694.4516
[57] Mokhtabademraei, S. M., & Panahi, S. (2007). Analyzing the role of interior architecture in manifestation of the meaning in science fiction film. Honar-ha-ye-ziba, -(30), 107-118. https://www.sid.ir/paper/5636/en
[58] Manavirad, M., & Madadi, S. (2022). Typological Approach to Visual Metaphor in Commercial Advertising (Case Study: Instagram Network). Journal of Fine Arts: Visual Arts, 27(2), 103-113. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfava.2022.324854.666715
[59] Kovecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (2 ed.). Oxford University Press. https://books.google.com/books?id=zlsm5XpRGYMC
[60] Antoniades, A. C. (1992). Poetics of Architecture: Theory of Design. Wiley. https://ww w.wiley.com/en-us/Poetics+of+Architecture%3A+Theory+of+Design-p-97804712 85304
[61] Aeini, S., Afzalian, K., Etesam, I., & Shariatrad, F. (2022). Metaphor as an Extension of Deduction and Method of Architectural Design Reasoning. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 19(110), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.22034/bagh.2022.3034 27.4993
[62] Davoodi, S. (2006). Origins of the birth of the scheme in the architectural design process [Master, Yazd University]. Yazd, Iran. https://ganj.irandoc.ac.ir/#/articles/135c7ad ddabb1f93740353782a5c93d7
[63] Nouri, M., Azizi, S., & Mousapour, M. (2021). Explaining the role of metaphor and analogy techniques in the architectural design process: Problem-understanding and Problem-solving. Hoviatshahr, 15(3), 103-119. https://doi.org/10.30495/hoviatshahr.2021.1 6034
[64] Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4 ed.). Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/n am/qualitative-inquiry-and-research-design/book246896
[65] Bazargan Harandi, A. (2023). An introduction to qualitative research methods and mixed: approaches in behavioral sciences (13 ed.). Didavar. https://www.adinehbook.com/ gp/product/6001040320
[66] Tahoori, N. (2018). Learning from Heidegger: Phenomenology in Architecture The Impact of Heidegger’s Philosophy on Architectural Theory – The Identity of Place in Theories of C. Norberg-Schulz and C. Alexander. Kimiya-ye-Honar, 6(25), 73-92. http://kimi ahonar.ir/article-1-1181-en.html
[67] Shafiei Kadkani, M. (2022). Fiction in Persian poetry (23 ed.). Aghah. https://www.iran ketab.ir/book/12061-fiction-in-persian-poetry
[68] Afrashi, A. (2021). Metaphor and cognition (2 ed.). Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. https://www.ihcs.ac.ir/fa/news/21448
[69] Hojat, I., & Ansari, H. R. (2010). Rethinking architectural education Studies based on high school education. Journal of Fine Arts: Architecture & Urban Planning, 2(44), 15-26. https://jfaup.ut.ac.ir/article_23972.html?lang=en
فصلنامه علمی کارافن
دوره 20، شماره 4
هنر و معماری / کشاورزی
بهمن 1402
صفحه 111-135

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 31 خرداد 1402
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 27 شهریور 1402
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 15 مهر 1402

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار