توسعه یک مدل سیستمی چابک‌سازی چندسطحی فرایندها در زنجیره تأمین با استفاده از پویایی‌شناسی سیستم‌ها: مورد مطالعه شرکت گاز

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کاربردی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت صنعتی، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، واحد قزوین، دانشگاه آزاد قزوین، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشگاه آزاد قزوین، قزوین، ایران.

3 دانشیار گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشگاه آزاد قزوین، قزوین، ایران.

10.48301/kssa.2022.341912.2106

چکیده

یکی از مسائل مهم در شرکت‌های توزیع گاز در کشور، چابک‌سازی چندسطحی فرایندها در زنجیره تأمین خود می‌باشد. از این رو هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی عوامل مختلف در چابک‌سازی فرایندها با استفاده از رویکرد پویایی‌شناسی سیستم‌ها می‌باشد. جامعه آماری این پژوهش، کلیه مدیران 7 شرکت استانی گازرسانی است. در این پژوهش به‌منظور شناسایی متغیرهای تأثیرگذار در چابکی فرایندها از روش دلفی، با هدف تحلیل همبستگی بین داده‌ها از آزمون‌های آماری، با هدف تقسیم‌بندی متغیرهای علّی و معلولی از روش دیمتل و برای تحلیل مدل پویا و شبیه‌سازی از سیستم داینامیک استفاده شده است. اعتبار مدل براساس آزمون‌های اعتبار ساختاری و رفتاری سنجیده شده است. نتایج حاکی از آن است که به دلیل تغییر کارایی، هزینه اجرای تغییرات در یک سیستم از نظر چرخه، متغیر است و در مراحل بعدی، هزینه توسعه افزایش می‌یابد که این تأخیر باعث افزایش هزینه‌ها و کاهش بهره‌وری توسعه می‌شود. همچنین، شبیه‌سازی نشان می‌دهد که چابک‌سازی فرایند به تکمیل وظایف بیشتر و با هزینه کمتر کمک می‌کند. مدل پویایی توسعه‌یافته در این تحقیق می‌تواند به‌عنوان ابزاری توسط سازمان برای درک و تحلیل تأثیرات شیوه‌های مختلف توسعه سریع و استراتژی مدیریت زنجیره تأمین مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing A System Model of Process Agility in Supply Chain Using Systems Dynamics (Case Study: Gas Company)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seied ali asghar Tavasolian 1
  • Sadegh Abedi 2
  • Ali Mohtashami 3
1 PhD Student, Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran .
3 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
چکیده [English]

One of the most important issues in gas distribution companies in the country is the multi-level agility of processes in their supply chains. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to investigate various factors in process agility using the systems dynamics approach. The statistical population of this research comprised of all managers of seven provincial gas supply companies. In this research, the Delphi method was used to identify the variables affecting process agility, statistical tests were used to analyze the correlation between data, the Dimtel method was used to classify the causal and effectual variables, and dynamic system analysis was used for dynamic model analysis and simulation. The validity of the model was measured based on structural and behavioral validity tests. The results showed that due to changes in performance, the cost of implementing changes in a system varied in terms of cycle and in the later stages, the cost of development increased. This delay also increased costs and reduced development productivity. Moreover, the simulation illustrated that process agility helped complete more tasks at a lower cost. The dynamics model developed in this research can be used as a tool by an organization to understand and analyze the effects of different rapid development practices and supply chain management strategies.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Agility
  • Process
  • Supply chain
  • Dynamic systems

مراجع

Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2005 .12.004
Arefnejad, M., Sepahvand, R., & Rahimi Aghdam, S. (2020). A Model of Organizational Agility Improvement Based on Human Resources Flexibility in Banking Industry. Journal of Human Resource Management, 10(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/jhrs.2020.1 55360.1111
Castro, H., Putnik, G. D., & Shah, V. (2012). A review of agile and lean manufacturing as issues in selected international and national research and development programs and roadmaps. The Learning Organization, 19(3), 267-289. https://doi.org/10.1108/096964712112 20064
Christopher, M., & Towill, D. (2001). An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030110394914
Chung, S., Lee, K. Y., & Kim, K. (2014). Job performance through mobile enterprise systems: The role of organizational agility, location independence, and task characteristics. Information & Management, 51(6), 605-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.05.007
Davoodi, S. M. R., & Forutan Chehr, S. (2019). Dynamic Analysis of Ordering System in the Supply Chain with the Dynamics of Systems Approach. Journal of Strategic Management in Industrial Systems, 14(48), 51-60. https://imj.sanandaj.iau.ir/article _667998.html?lang=en
 Farhi Moghadam, A. R., & MohammadJafari, M. (2017, December 28). Investigating the impact of lean and agile supply chain strategies on supply chain performance and company performance with the mediating role of information systems in Mapna Development Company (2) 3nd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/756943/
Gabriel, S., Niewoehner, N., Asmar, L., Kühn, A., & Dumitrescu, R. (2021). Integration of agile practices in the product development process of intelligent technical systems. Procedia CIRP, 100(11), 427-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.099
Ghamkhari, S. M. (2021). Providing a Model of Strategic Agility Determining its Status in Knowledge-Based Industries. Public Organizations Management, 9(2), 137-152. htt ps://doi.org/10.30473/ipom.2020.52908.4092
Gorjipour, S., Moradian, R., Arghish, O., & Rahimi Baghmalek, J. (2020, March 12). Provide scientific research on proposed solutions to improve the supply chain agility of the National Iranian Oil Company and the Southern Oilfields. 6th International Conference on Research in Management, Economics and Development, Tbilisi, Georgia. https:// civilica.com/doc/1010343/
Govil, N., & Sharma, A. (2022). Validation of agile methodology as ideal software development process using Fuzzy-TOPSIS method. Advances in Engineering Software, 168, 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2022.103125
Haghguyan, Z., Rahimi Gaini, A., & Bakhtiari, H. (2018, August 6). Designing a model for organizational agility. Forth International Conference criticize and analysis  of management, Fars, Shiraz, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/814227/
Heimicke, J., Ng, G-L., Krüger, M., & Albers, A. (2021). A systematic for realizing agile principles in the process of mechatronic systems development through individual selection of suitable process models, methods and practices. Procedia CIRP, 100, 619-624. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.05.133
Khorshid, S. (2011). The integrated model of Fuzzy QFD, Fuzzy AHP fuzzy weighted averaged technique for building agile of manufacture. Industrial Management Studies, 9(23), 97-129. https://jims.atu.ac.ir/article_4531.html
Ku, E. C. S. (2022). Developing business process agility: Evidence from inter-organizational information systems of airlines and travel agencies. Journal of Air Transport Management, 103(4), 102247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2022.102247
Lin, C-T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P-Y. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 285-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2 004.11.013
Malmir, A., & Norouzzadeh, A. (2021). The mediating role of organizational agility in relation to knowledge management and organizational development. Journal of Police Organizational Development, 18(1), 101-120. https://www.magiran.com/paper/232 7060
Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. (1999, August 9-12). Agile or leagile: matching your supply chain to the marketplace. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Production Research, Limerick, Ireland.
Mohseni Moghadam, A., Shiri, A., & Viseh, S. M. (2015, May 27). Investigating the effect of organizational intelligence and organizational agility on the organizational performance of the staff of the Court of Audit International Conference on Management, Economics, Financial System, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. https://civilica.com/doc/390288
Nasib, S. (2018, July 2). The effect of strategic entrepreneurship on organizational agility with the mediation of knowledge sharing (case study: Kale Group). 11th International Conference On Accounting &Management And 8th International Conference On Entrepreneurship&Open Innovation, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/777765/
Pirdastan, M., & Aghaeipour, Y. (2021). Consequence of business analysis in increasing the agility of companies and organizations in the agility process. Science and Engineering Elite, 6(6), 34-56. https://www.sid.ir/paper/967799/en
Sanadgol, M. (2014). The survey of relationship between organizational agility and principals job satisfaction. International Journal of Basic Sciences & Applied Research, 3, 317-319. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Survey-of-Relationship-between-Organizational-Sanadgol/792701fdb24b8a6c1f0e88211077f1b6074d1e3f
Schuh, G., Dölle, C., Kantelberg, J., & Menges, A. (2018). Identification of Agile Mechanisms of Action As Basis for Agile Product Development. Procedia CIRP, 70(5), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.02.007
Sherehiy, B., & Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002
Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. N. (2006). A framework for assessing value chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(2), 118-140. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610641639
Vahdati, H., & Naemi, A. M. (2020). The Relationship between Information and Communication Technology and Organizational Agility with the Mediating Role of Targeted Organizational Forgetting among the Employees. Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, 27(3), 441-451. https://jsums.medsab.ac.ir/article_1319.html?lan g=en
Van Hoek, R. I. (2001). Epilogue ‐ Moving forward with agility. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.1108/096 00030110394941
Vázquez‐Bustelo, D., Avella, L., & Fernández, E. (2007). Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(12), 1303-1332. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710835633
Wiencierz, C., & Röttger, U. (2021). The change process to agile public relations. Public Relations Review, 47(5), 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102108
Zhang, D. Z. (2011). Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies—Case studies of an agility taxonomy. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(1), 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.08.010
Žitkienė, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational agility conceptual model. Montenegrin journal of economics, 14(2), 115-129. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7
فصلنامه علمی کارافن
دوره 20، ویژه نامه
علوم انسانی
شهریور 1402
صفحه 667-692

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 01 خرداد 1401
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 05 مهر 1401
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 23 مهر 1401

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار