تجاری‌سازی دانش مبتنی بر نقش دوسوتوانی مدیریتی در آموزش عالی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کاربردی)

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزش عالی، گروه مدیریت آموزشی و آموزش عالی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی و آموزش عالی، واحد تهران مرکزی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد رامسر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، رامسر، ایران.

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر، تجاری‌سازی دانش مبتنی بر نقش دوسوتوانی مدیریتی در آموزش عالی بود. روش پژوهش، برحسب هدف، کاربردی با رویکرد کیفی است. داده‎های پژوهش با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای استقرایی چارچوب‎های تجاری‌سازی دانش و برگزاری دو دوره پنل دلفی خبرگان تجاری‌سازی دانش مبتنی بر دوسوتوانی گردآوری شد. جامعه آماری، 28 نفر از خبرگان دانشگاهی، متخصصان و افراد مشغول به کار در مراکز رشد در استان مازندران بودند. در این بخش، از روش نمونه‎گیری هدفمند با در نظر گرفتن قانون اشباع نظری استفاده شد. داده‎ها از طریق اجرای پرسش‌نامه نیمه‎ساختاریافته گردآوری شد. روایی محتوایی این پرسش‎نامه با کمک استادان گروه‎های متخصص تأیید شد. یافته‎ها نشان داد که ابعاد تجاری‌سازی دانش، مبتنی بر دوسوتوانی مدیریتی دارای چهار مؤلفه شامل حمایت‌های مدیران، اقدامات توانمندساز مدیر، اقدامات انگیزش‎زای مدیر، اقدامات فرصت‎آفرین و 28 شاخص بود. هم‎چنین، یافته‎ها نشان داد که تمامی ابعاد، مؤلفه‎ها و شاخص‎ها مورد تأیید قرار گرفتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Knowledge Commercialization Based on the Role of Managerial Ambiguity in Higher Education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Akrameh alsadat Yaghubi 1
  • Yalda Delgoshaei 2
  • Leila Hosseinitabaghdehi 3
  • Fereshteh Kordestani 2
1 PhD Student of Higher Education Managment, Department of Educational Management & Higher Education Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management & Higher Education Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Ramsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ramsar, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of knowledge commercialization in higher education based on managerial ambiguity. Applied research method was used in terms of purpose with a qualitative approach. Research data was collected using inductive content analysis of knowledge commercialization frameworks and holding two Delphi panel of knowledge commercialization experts based on dual ambiguity. The statistical population included 28 university experts, specialists and personnel working at incubation centers of Mazandaran Province. In this section, purposive sampling method was used considering the theoretical saturation law. Data was collected through a semi-structured questionnaire. The content validity of this questionnaire was confirmed with the help of professors of expert groups. Findings showed that the dimensions of knowledge commercialization based on managerial dual competence had 4 components including managerial support, managerial empowerment measures, managerial motivational measures, opportunistic measures and 28 indicators. In addition, the findings showed that all dimensions, components and indicators were confirmed. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Knowledge
  • Knowledge commercialization
  • Organizational ambiguity
  • Managers

مراجع

Abbas, A., Avdic, A., Xiaobao, P., Hasan, M. M., & Ming, W. (2019). University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2 018.03.002
Abbasi Esfanjani, H., & Forouzandeh Dehkordi, L. (2014). Identify and Explanation the Factors that Affects in Commercialization of University Research Using Triangulation Model. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 6(4), 33-46. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/V iewPaper.aspx?id=233902
Aghajani, H. A., Hosseini, A., & Sarwari Ashliki, Z. (2015). Identification and prioritization of factors affecting the commercialization of products of knowledge-based companies with FAHP technique (Experimental control: knowledge-based companies located in growth centers of northern regions of Iran). Operations research in its applications (applied mathematics), 12(3), 85-100. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id =264499
Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60. https://doi.org/10.1287/m nsc.48.1.44.14279
Alipor Terbeti, Z., Afrasiabi, R., & Ismail Nia, K. (2017, April 23). Commercialization of University Research Results in Knowledge-Based Economics. National Conference on Knowledge -based Architecture and Urbanism, Tehran, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/6 41169/
Bandarian, R. (2013). Simultaneous ambiguity, an appropriate model for organizing exploration and exploitation activities in the Research and Technology Organization. Bi-Quarterly Journal of Industrial Technology Development, 11(22), 21-32. https://civilica.com/doc/ 1017276/
Batyari, A., Nyazazari, K., & Jabbary, N. (2019). Identifying Effective Factors in Conversion of Knowledge to Wealth from the Experts Viewpoint of Golestan University Universities. Future study Management, 30(116), 140-152. https://jmfr.srbiau.ac.ir/article_14189_5 84a8b88f8187c8e6a992069b7e118c8.pdf
Biranvand, A. (2020). Factors Affecting Knowledge Commercialisation in University: A Case Study. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 40(2), 421-430. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.40.2.14829
Clayton, P., Feldman, M., & Lowe, N. (2018). Behind the Scenes: Intermediary Organizations that Facilitate Science Commercialization Through Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 104-124. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2016.0133
Cristina, B. G., & Julian, B. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Ebrahimpour, M., Moradi, M., & Mombiniy, Y. (2014). Effect of organizational ambidexterity on the manufacturing industries performance: Investigation the role of environmental dynamics. Iranian journal of management sciences, 9(36), 53-76. http://journal.iams.ir /article_197_06337e5fbbf086bfb540a8ee5c2e9619.pdf
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(0 2)00009-4
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Ghorehjili, S., Rahmati, M., & PourKarimi, J. (2020). Presentation of the Ambidextrous leadership Model of Universities Based on Grounded Theory (Case Study: Tehran State University). Public Organizations Management, 8(2), 143-168. https://doi.or g/10.30473/IPOM.2020.49929.3901
Hmieleski, K. M., & Powell, E. E. (2018). The Psychological Foundations of University Science Commercialization: A Review of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 43-77. https://doi.org/10. 5465/amp.2016.0139
Hosseini, S. (2013). Investigating the harms and challenges of the relationship between industry and Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz [Master, Shahid Chamran ]. Ahvaz, Iran.
Hsieh, C.-H. (2013). Patent value assessment and commercialization strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(2), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012. 09.014
Ismail, N., Nor, M. J. M., & Sidek, S. (2015). A Framework for a Successful Research Products Commercialisation: A Case of Malaysian Academic Researchers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j .sbspro.2015.06.163
Jedi Kar, A., Taqwaei Yazdi, M., & Yousefi Saeed Abadi, R. (2020). Presenting a Model of the Relationship between Intellectual Property Management and Higher Education Commercialization. Leadership and Educational Management, 14(1), 57-76.
Kheirandish, M., Tabrizi, E., & Khamoie, F. (2017). The Identification and Prioritization of Organizational factors in Knowledge Commercialization according to Q Methodology. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 10(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.22059/jed.2 017.62290
Khosrowabadi, S. (2016). Presenting a model in order to explain the role of organizational ambidexterity in establishment of entrepreneurial university [P.H.D, Islamic Azad]. Sari, Iran. http://192. 168.0.11/simwebclt/WebAccess/SimWebPortal.dll/DubSrch
Köseoglu, M. A., Chan, E. S. W., Okumus, F., & Altin, M. (2019). How do hotels operationalize their competitive intelligence efforts into their management processes? Proposing a holistic model. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 83, 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.11.007
Lame, M., & Kazempour, E. (2020). A Commercialization Model of Research in the Field of Educational Sciences. Educational Development of Judishapur, 11(3), 411-426. https://doi.org/10.22118/edc.2020.216026.1251
Lubatkin, M. H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms: The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration. Journal of Management, 32(5), 646-672. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630 6290712
Lundvall, B.-Å. (2004). Why the New Economy is Learning Economy. In Techno-Economic Paradigms: Essays in Honour of Carlota Perez. Anthem Press. https://doi.org/10.7135 /UPO9781843318224.015
Majidi Leif Shagard, H. (2014). Investigating the effect of transformational leadership style and organizational ambiguity on human resources performance (Case study: Fooman Shimi Industrial Group [M.Sc, Guilan]. Guilan, Iran. https://www.virasci ence.com/thesis/807674/
Maragheh Chian, M. (2017). Investigating the Impact of Transformational Leadership on Organizational ambidexterity in the Moderating Role of Adaptive Culture [M.Sc, Kharazmi]. Tehran, Iran.
Masum, M., & Nowrozi, N. (2020). New product development through the Pro-innovation culture and organizational ambidexterity (Case study: Sports equipment manufacturers). Journal Of Business Management, 12(46), 226-251. http://bmj.iauctb.ac.ir/article_673831_e0c3b 5d6f21bbe02140b12d7560cc491.pdf
Mir, A., Bagheri, M., Hashemi, S. A. (2018). Components affecting student's commercialization of knowledge management. Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 12(3), 261-278. http://edu.journals.iau-garmsar.ac.ir/article_545780.html?l ang=fa
Mohammad Pourmir, M. M., Shojaei, S. (2019). Factors affecting the commercialization of innovative academic research based on information technology; A Study in the Faculties of Marine Sciences of the Technical and Vocational University of Iran. Scientific Quarterly of Marine Science Education, 6(17), 55-67. https://www.sid.ir /fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=510515
MohammadPoormir, M. M., Shojaei, S., Samiei, R., & Ashrafi, M. (2020). Investigating the underlying factors affecting the commercialization of technological research achievements A Mixed Approach (Case Study: Technical and Vocational University of Iran). Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal, 16(46), 33-50. https://karafan.tvu.ac.ir/a rticle_105312_496e3b7e60807fcbf5ef61298ed6ae46.pdf
Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499-1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.023
Namdarian, L. (2018, October 18). Investigating the commercialization strategies of research results. International Conference on Management, Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, Takestan. https://www.sid.ir/fa/seminar/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=94358
Nemanich, L. A., & Vera, D. (2009). Transformational leadership and ambidexterity in the context of an acquisition. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.11.002
Nemati, A. A. (2008). Strategies to promote government-university-industry interaction; A framework for the Fifth Construction Plan. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology Higher Education Research and Planning Institute.
Niaz Azari, K., Salehi, M., & Khosrowabadi, S. (2016). Design and implementation of instrumentation to evaluate ambiguity in organizational management. Urban Management(44), 195-210. https://irisweb.ir/files/site1/rds_journals/1081/article-1081-209411.pdf
Norouzi, T., Delangizan, S., & Rezaee, B. (2016). Design a model for the commercialization of the research findings. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 9(3), 553-572. https:/ /doi.org/10.22059/jed.2016.60916
O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://do i.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Pournaghi, R., & Hejazi, A. S. (2017). Investigating the effective factors on knowledge commercialization from the perspective of graduate students of Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University. Information Processing and Management 34(3), 1023-1050. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/399861/
Qelich Lee, B., & Rajabi Shahrabadi, E. (2014). Study of the relationship between knowledge creation, technology-based innovation and organizational agility (Case study: Iran Alloy Steel Company). Industrial Management Perspectives, 4(16), 95-116. https://www.noormags.ir/view/fa/articlepage/1307285/
Raei Dehaghi, M. (2019). Identifying and Prioritizing the Barriers of Academic Research Commercialization. Journal Of Management Futures Research(Journal Of Management Research), 30(117 ), 69-86. https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx?ID=693857
Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26(4), 518-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovati on.2004.11.005
Sadeghi, A., & Rad, F. (2018). The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management and innovation. Management Science Letters, 8(3), 151-160. http://m.growingscience.com/ msl/Vol8/msl_2018_3.pdf
Sadeghian, F. (2017). Identifying structural factors affecting the development of university companies (Case study of Allameh Tabatabai University) [Master, Allameh Tabatabai ]. Tehran, Iran.
Shahrabi, A., Tahmasebi-Limooni, S., & Razavi, S. A. A. (2019). Study of Effective Factors of the commercialization of research projects in medical universities. Clinical Excellence, 9(2), 38-45. http://ce.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-458-en.html http://ce.mazums.ac.ir/article-1-458-en.pdf
Shams Elahi., D. (2013). Identifying and prioritizing the key factors of success in knowledge commercialization and its impact on financial independence of universities [Master, Sistan and Baluchestan ]. Iran.
Shi, D., & Ge, Y. (2019). Academic Engagement and Commercialization in an Institutional Transition Environment: Evidence from Shanghai Maritime University. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.07725, 1-30. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07725
Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A Typology for Aligning Organizational Ambidexterity's Conceptualizations, Antecedents, and Outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing Strategic Contradictions: A Top Management Model for Managing Innovation Streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522-536. https://d oi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0134
Yadali Farsi, J., Zare Hadi., & Hejazi, S. R. (2012). Identification of dual power components affecting the commercialization performance of academic research. Research and planning in higher education, 18(1), 69-90. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.as px?id=175787
Yadollahi Farsi, J., & Kalathai, Z. (2012). Ranking Indigenous Factors Affecting Technology Commercialization Strategy Selection: A Case Study of the Biotechnology Industry. New Economy and Trade, , 7(27-28), 1-22.
Yadollahi Farsi Yadollahi Farsi, J., Zare, H., &  Zare, G. (2011, February 16). Analyzing the role of organizational dual power in the commercialization performance of university research First International Conference on Management and Innovation, Shiraz, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/108408/
فصلنامه علمی کارافن
دوره 18، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 53
علوم انسانی
تیر 1400
صفحه 297-317

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 14 دی 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 13 اسفند 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 28 فروردین 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار