فصلنامه علمی کارافن

فصلنامه علمی کارافن

اثر افزودن سرباره بر مشخصات شکست بتن ژئوپلیمری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی (کاربردی)

نویسنده
گروه مهندسی عمران ، دانشگاه ملی مهارت، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
این پژوهش به بررسی اثر جایگزینی خاکستر بادی با سرباره کوره بلند دانه‌بندی‌شده در بتن ژئوپلیمری سبک‌وزن پرداخته است. از آنجا که بتن ژئوپلیمری با حذف سیمان به کاهش مصرف سیمان پرتلند و همچنین کاهش پیامدهای منفی زیست‌محیطی آن کمک می‌کند، این موضوع بسیار مهم است. در این پژوهش، از سنگ‌دانه رس منبسط شده سبک به عنوان سنگ‌دانه درشت استفاده شده و نسبت فعال‌کننده به چسب(Al/Bi ) ۰.۵ تعیین شده است. نمونه‌ها شامل مکعب‌های مقاومت فشاری، استوانه‌های مقاومت کششی و مدول الاستیسیته و تیرهای ناچ‌دار برای آزمایش شکست بودند. عمل‌آوری در دمای ۸۰ درجه سانتی‌گراد به مدت ۲۴ ساعت انجام شد. نتایج نشان دادند که جایگزینی ۲۰٪ سرباره موجب افزایش ۱۶٪ مقاومت فشاری نسبت به نمونه شاهد گردید. همچنین، انرژی شکست و چقرمگی شکست در ۳۰٪ سرباره به بیشینه مقدار خود رسیدند (بهبود حدود ۶۳٪ نسبت به نمونه بدون سرباره). با افزایش جایگزینی به ۴۰ و ۵۰٪، کاهش در این خواص مشاهده شد. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهند که محدوده ۲۰ تا ۳۰٪ سرباره بهینه‌ترین ترکیب برای بهبود عملکرد مکانیکی و شکست بتن ژئوپلیمری است. این نتایج اهمیت قابل توجهی در توسعه مصالح پایدار و کاهش مصرف سیمان پرتلند دارند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The effect of slag addition on the fracture characteristics of geopolymer concrete

نویسنده English

Mohammad Reza Abbasi Zargaleh
Department of Civil Engineering, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

This study investigates the effect of replacing fly ash with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) in lightweight geopolymer concrete. Given that geopolymer concrete eliminates the use of Portland cement, thereby contributing to reduced cement consumption and mitigating its negative environmental impacts, this topic holds particular significance. In this research, lightweight expanded clay aggregate was employed as coarse aggregate, and the activator-to-binder ratio (Al/Bi) was set at 0.5. The specimens included cubes for compressive strength, cylinders for tensile strength and elastic modulus, and notched beams for fracture testing. Curing was performed at 80 °C for 24 hours. The results revealed that a 20% slag replacement led to a 16% increase in compressive strength compared to the control specimen. Furthermore, fracture energy and fracture toughness reached their maximum at 30% slag replacement, with an improvement of approximately 63% relative to the slag-free specimen. However, further replacement levels of 40% and 50% resulted in a decline in these properties. The findings indicate that a slag replacement range of 20–30% provides the optimum balance for enhancing both the mechanical performance and fracture behavior of geopolymer concrete. These results underscore the substantial importance of such mixtures in advancing sustainable construction materials and reducing Portland cement consumption.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Geopolymer concrete
lightweight
fracture parameters
high-temperature curing
fly ash
slag
[1] Assi, L. N., Deaver, E. E., & Ziehl, P. (2018). Effect of source and particle size distribution on the mechanical and microstructural properties of fly Ash-Based geopolymer concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 167, 372-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.193.
[2] Singh, N., & Singh, S. (2018). Evaluating the performance of self compacting concretes made with recycled coarse and fine aggregates using non destructive testing techniques. Construction and Building Materials, 181, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.039.
[3] Singh, N. B., & Middendorf, B. (2020). Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 237, 117455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117455 .
[4] Mohyeddin, A., Karmokar, T., & Fardipour, M. (2025). Fracture energy of ambient-cured fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2025.2535086.
[5] Zhao, C., Yuan, Y., Wen, S., Wang, Y., & Tan, B. (2025). Research on Ambient-Temperature Synthesis of High-Strength Geopolymer Concrete: Parameter Optimization and Strength Prediction Model. Case Studies in Construction Materials, e05123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2025.e05123.
[6] Bazarkhankyzy, A., Murali, G., Aibuldinov, Y., Iskakova, Z., Kurpińska, M., Abdelgader, H. S., Avudaiappan, S., & Dixit, S. (2025). Comprehensive evaluation of impact strength and microstructural characteristics of geopolymer concrete reinforced with four types of natural fibers of varying lengths. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 29624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14857-5.
[7] Sheydaei, P., Mohsennia, E., & Toufigh, V. (2025). Fracture and mechanical properties of GGBFS-based geopolymer concrete incorporating rice husk ash and natural zeolite. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 37(5), 04025079. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-18861.
[8] Pan, Z., Sanjayan, J. G., & Rangan, B. V. (2011). Fracture properties of geopolymer paste and concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 63(10), 763-771. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.2011.63.10.763.
[9] Qiu, J., Zhao, Y., Xing, J., & Sun, X. (2019). Fly Ash/Blast Furnace Slag‐Based Geopolymer as a Potential Binder for Mine Backfilling: Effect of Binder Type and Activator Concentration. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2019(1), 2028109. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2028109.
[10] Das, D., Das, A. P., & Rout, P. K. (2021). Effect of slag addition on compressive strength and microstructural features of fly ash based geopolymer. In Circular economy in the construction industry (61-68). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003217619-9.
[11] Puertas, F., Martı́nez-Ramı́rez, S., Alonso, S., & Vázquez, T. (2000). Alkali-activated fly ash/slag cements: Strength behaviour and hydration products. Cement and concrete research, 30(10), 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00298-2.
[12] Ling, Y., Wang, K., Li, W., Shi, G., & Lu, P. (2019). Effect of slag on the mechanical properties and bond strength of fly ash-based engineered geopolymer composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 164, 747-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.01.092.
[13] Collins, F., & Sanjayan, J. (2001). Microcracking and strength development of alkali activated slag concrete. Cement and Concrete Composites, 23(4-5), 345-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-9465(01)00003-8.
[14] Sasui, S., Kim, G., Nam, J., Koyama, T., & Chansomsak, S. (2020). Strength and microstructure of class-C fly ash and GGBS blend geopolymer activated in NaOH & NaOH+ Na2SiO3. Materials, 13(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010059.
[15] Nath, P., & Sarker, P. K. (2017). Fracture properties of GGBFS-blended fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient temperature. Materials and Structures, 50(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-016-0893-6 .
[16] Bharatkumar, B., Raghuprasad, B., Ramachandramurthy, D., Narayanan, R., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2005). Effect of fly ash and slag on the fracture characteristics of high performance concrete. Materials and Structures, 38(1), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02480576.
[17] Midhun, M., Rao, T. G., & Srikrishna, T. C. (2018). Mechanical and fracture properties of glass fiber reinforced geopolymer concrete. Advances in concrete construction, 6(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2018.6.1.029.
[18] Sarker, P. K., Haque, R., & Ramgolam, K. V. (2013). Fracture behaviour of heat cured fly ash based geopolymer concrete. Materials & Design, 44, 580-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.08.005
[19] Al-Rawi, S., & Taysi, N. (2018). Performance of self-compacting geopolymer concrete with and without GGBFS and steel fiber. Advances in Concrete Construction, 6 (4), 323-344. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2018.6.4.323 .
[20] Moharrer, M. (2024). Barrasi-ye asar-e jaygozini-ye pasmand-e maseh hasel az karkhaneh-ye sandblast ba siman dar moshakhasat-e rheology va mekaniki-ye beton [Investigation of the effect of replacing sandblasting waste with cement on the rheological and mechanical properties of concrete]. Karafan Scientific Quarterly, 21(3), 325-346. https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2023.409074.2640 .
[21] Bahrami, S., Shakeri, A., & Hajikalaei, H. (2021). Era'eh-ye tarh-e ekhtelat-e pishnehadi-ye beton-e bazyafati mored-e estefade dar jadavel-e betoni-ye shahri ba estefade az shabake-ye asabi [Proposed mix design of recycled concrete used in urban concrete pavements using an artificial neural network]. Karafan Scientific Quarterly, 17(4), 215-238. https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2021.128404 . (In Persian)
[22] Hasani, A., & Nematzadeh, M. (2022). Raftar-e feshari va davam-e beton havi-ye sangdanehaye zayeati jaygozin-e doroshtdaneh va powder-e sang-e marmar jaygozin-e siman [Compressive behavior and durability of concrete containing recycled coarse aggregates and marble powder as a cement replacement]. Karafan Scientific Quarterly, 19(1), 83-105. https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2022.314386.1831 . (In Persian)
[23] Ding, Y., Dai, J.-G., & Shi, C.-J. (2018). Fracture properties of alkali-activated slag and ordinary Portland cement concrete and mortar. Construction and Building Materials, 165, 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.202 .
[24] Khan, M. Z. N., Hao, Y., Hao, H., & Shaikh, F. U. A. (2018). Mechanical properties of ambient cured high strength hybrid steel and synthetic fibers reinforced geopolymer composites. Cement and Concrete Composites, 85, 133-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2017.10.011 .
[25] Khalilpour, S., BaniAsad, E., & Dehestani, M. (2019). A review on concrete fracture energy and effective parameters. Cement and concrete research, 120, 294-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.03.013 .
[26] Hilsdorf, H., & Brameshuber, W. (1991). Code-type formulation of fracture mechanics concepts for concrete. International journal of fracture, 51(1), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00017920 .
[27] Ganesan, N., Abraham, R., DEEPA, R. S., & Sasi, D. (2015). Fracture properties of geopolymer concrete. ASIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING (BUILDING AND HOUSING), 127-134. https://www.sid.ir/paper/299102/en .
[28] Yeshiwas, M. D., Yehualaw, M. D., Habtegebreal, B. T., Nebiyu, W. M., & Taffese, W. Z. (2025). Rice Husk Ash and Waste Marble Powder as Alternative Materials for Cement. Infrastructures, 10(4), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10040078 .
[29] Uysal, M., Aygörmez, Y., Canpolat, O., Cosgun, T., & Kuranlı, Ö. F. (2022). Investigation of using waste marble powder, brick powder, ceramic powder, glass powder, and rice husk ash as eco-friendly aggregate in sustainable red mud-metakaolin based geopolymer composites. Construction and Building Materials, 361, 129718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129718 .
[30] Mukhtiar, F., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., Hussain, W., & Ali, S. (2022). Effect of marble powder on fly ash based one part geopolymer mortar. Int Res J Mod Eng Technol Sci, 4(6), 567-572. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377454830 .
[31] Bazant, Z. P., Kazemi,M.T. (1990). Determination of fracture energy, process zone longth and brittleness number from size effect, with application to rock and conerete. International journal of fracture, 44(2), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047063 .
[32] RILEM FMT-89. (1990). Fracture mechanics of concrete–test methods, Size-effect method for determining fracture energy and process zone size of concrete. Materials and Structures, 23, 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02472030.
[33] ASTM C618. (2013). Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. In: ASTM international. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0618-13.
[34] ASTM C136. (2005). Standard test method for sieve analysis of fine and coarse aggregates. In American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0136-05.
[35] ASTM C469. (2002). Standard test method for static modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of concrete in compression. In Annual Book of ASTM standards (Vol. 4). https://doi.org/10.1520/C0469-02.
[36] ASTM C496. (2011). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. In Annual Book of ASTM Standard, American Society for Testing and Materials. https://doi.org/10.1520/C0496_C0496M-11.
[37] BSI. (2009). BS EN 12390-3:2009. Testing hardened concrete—Part 3: Compressive strength of test specimens. British Standards Institution, London, UK. https://knowledge.bsigroup.com/products/testing-hardened-concrete-compressive-strength-of-test-specimens-1.
دوره 23، شماره 1
فنی و مهندسی
بهار 1405
صفحه 624-644

  • تاریخ دریافت 15 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 13 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 01 اردیبهشت 1405