[1] Zhu, G-N., Hu, J., Qi, J., Gu, C-C., & Peng, Y-H. (2015). An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number.
Advanced Engineering Informatics,
29(3), 408-418.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.01.010
[2] Qi, J., Hu, J., & Peng, Y. (2021). A customer-involved design concept evaluation based on multi-criteria decision-making fusing with preference and design values.
Advanced Engineering Informatics,
50, 101373.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101373
[3] Ayağ, Z. (2005). A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment.
Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers Transactions,
37(9), 827-842.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07408170590969852
[4] Zhai, L-Y., Khoo, L-P., & Zhong, Z-W. (2009). Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis.
Expert Systems with Applications,
36(3), 7072-7079.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.08.068
[5] Ayağ, Z. (2016). An integrated approach to concept evaluation in a new product development.
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,
27(5), 991-1005.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0930-7
[6] Liu, W., Tan, R., Cao, G., Zhang, Z., Huang, S., & Liu, L. (2019). A proposed radicality evaluation method for design ideas at conceptual design stage.
Computers & Industrial Engineering,
132, 141-152.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.04.027
[7] Fazeli, H. R., & Peng, Q. (2022). Generation and evaluation of product concepts by integrating extended axiomatic design, quality function deployment and design structure matrix.
Advanced Engineering Informatics,
54, 101716.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022. 101716
[8] Ayağ, Z., & Özdemir, R. G. (2009). A hybrid approach to concept selection through fuzzy analytic network process.
Computers & Industrial Engineering,
56(1), 368-379.
http s://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.06.011
[9] Malekly, H., Meysam Mousavi, S., & Hashemi, H. (2010). A fuzzy integrated methodology for evaluating conceptual bridge design.
Expert Systems with Applications,
37(7), 4910-4920.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.024
[10] Liu, Y., Huang, H-Z., & Ling, D. (2013). Reliability prediction for evolutionary product in the conceptual design phase using neural network-based fuzzy synthetic assessment.
International Journal of Systems Science,
44(3), 545-555.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0 0207721.2011.617887
[11] Vinodh, S., Sai Balagi, T. S., & Patil, A. (2016). A hybrid MCDM approach for agile concept selection using fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS.
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,
83(9), 1979-1987.
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s00170-015-7718-6
[12] Olabanji, O. M., & Mpofu, K. (2020). Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept.
Heliyon,
6(1), e03182.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03182
[13] Zhou, T., Chen, Z., & Ming, X. (2022). Multi-criteria evaluation of smart product-service design concept under hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment: A novel cloud envelopment analysis approach.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence,
115, 105228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105228
[14] Zhu, G-N., Ma, J., & Hu, J. (2022). A fuzzy rough number extended AHP and VIKOR for failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty.
Advanced Engineering Informatics,
51, 101454.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101454
[15] Xie, G., Zhang, J., Lai, K. K., & Yu, L. (2008). Variable precision rough set for group decision-making: An application.
International Journal of Approximate Reasoning,
49(2), 331-343.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.04.005
[16] Li, G-D., Yamaguchi, D., & Nagai, M. (2008). A grey-based rough decision-making approach to supplier selection.
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,
36(9), 1032-1040.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0910-y
[17] Tiwari, V., Jain, P. K., & Tandon, P. (2016). Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method.
Advanced Engineering Informatics,
30(1), 16-25.
https://d oi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2015.11.005
[18] Shidpour, H., Da Cunha, C., & Bernard, A. (2016). Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory.
Expert Systems with Applications,
64, 633-644.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.022
[19] Pamučar, D., Mihajlović, M., Obradović, R., & Atanasković, P. (2017). Novel approach to group multi-criteria decision making based on interval rough numbers: Hybrid DEMATEL-ANP-MAIRCA model.
Expert Systems with Applications,
88, 58-80.
h ttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.06.037
[20] Elsisy, M. A., & El Sayed, M. A. (2019). Fuzzy rough bi-level multi-objective nonlinear programming problems.
Alexandria Engineering Journal,
58(4), 1471-1482.
https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2019.12.002
[21] Mei, M., & Chen, Z. (2021). Evaluation and selection of sustainable hydrogen production technology with hybrid uncertain sustainability indicators based on rough-fuzzy BWM-DEA.
Renewable Energy,
165(10211), 716-730.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.20 20.11.051
[22] Ecer, F., Pamucar, D., Mardani, A., & Alrasheedi, M. (2021). Assessment of renewable energy resources using new interval rough number extension of the level based weight assessment and combinative distance-based assessment.
Renewable Energy,
170(2), 1156-1177.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.004
[23] Amini, T., Nasiri, M., Saeedi, P., & Abbasi, E. (2020). Strategic entrepreneurship model based on financial development with a fuzzy AHP approach.
Karafan Quarterly Scientific Journal,
17(3), 127-141.
https://doi.org/10.48301/kssa.2020.124674
