Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Low Pressure Hydroforming of Aluminum Tubes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

Assistant professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Tube hydroforming process is used widely in production of car structural parts. High strength to weight ratio is one of the properties of parts which is produced using this process. Low pressure tube hydroforming (LPTH) is one method recommended for solving problems of tube hydroforming such as requiring high pressure of fluid and sealing problems. LPTH method is similar to crushing a hollow solid body. Unlike high pressure tube hydroforming, upper die is not fixed in this process and it moves at the same time by applying internal pressure and squeezes the tube. Main defects in low pressure hydroforming are tube wall thinning and geometric errors at final form of the part. In this paper, LPTH of AA6063 aluminum tubes was carried out and circular cross section of tube was deformed to rectangular. Thickness distribution, formed corner radius and flatness of top surface of part was investigated under three different loading paths. Results show that lower corner radius can be achieved with higher internal pressure while thinning is increased. Maximum of flatness was obtained when moving of the upper die was carried out after reaching the maximum of internal pressure. Minimum of radius was formed at upper corner equal to 5.63mm and at lower corner equal to 5.62mm under internal pressure of 10MPa. Concavity of upper surface of part was decreased to 0.2mm by applying 10MPa internal pressure.

Keywords

Main Subjects


[1] Gray, J. E., Devereaux, A. P., & Parker, W. M. (1940). Apparatus for making wrought metal T's. In: Google Patents.
[2] Zafar, N. (2002). Optimization of tube hydroforming process. Michigan State University. https://books.google.com/books/about/Optimization_of_Tube_Hydroforming_Proces.html?id=03BXnS6JIYkC
[3] Singh, H. (2003). Fundamentals of hydroforming. Society of Manufacturing Engineers. https://cart.sme.org/PersonifyEbusiness/Store/Product-Details/productId/115604#
[4] Nikhare, C., Weiss, M & ,.Hodgson, P. D. (2009). FEA comparison of high and low pressure tube hydroforming of TRIP steel. Computational Materials Science, 47(1), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.06.024
[5] Cui, X.-L., Wang, X.-S., & Yuan, S.-J. (2014). Deformation analysis of double-sided tube hydroforming in square-section die. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214(7), 1341-1351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.02.005
[6] Xu, X., Li, S., Zhang, W., & Lin, Z. (2009). Analysis of thickness distribution of square-sectional hydroformed parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(1), 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.01.034
[7] Orban, H., & Hu, S. J. (2007). Analytical modeling of wall thinning during corner filling in structural tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 194(1), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.03.112
[8] Manabe, K.-i., & Amino, M. (2002). Effects of process parameters and material properties on deformation process in tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 123(2), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00094-8
[9] Chow, C. L., & Yang, X. J. (2002). Bursting for fixed tubular and restrained hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 130-131, 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00754-9
[10] Hwang, Y.-M., & Chen, W.-C. (2005). Analysis of tube hydroforming in a square cross-sectional die. International Journal of Plasticity, 21(9), 1815-1833. https://doi.org/10 .1016/j.ijplas.2004.09.004
[11] Hashemi, S., Naeini, H. M., Liaghat, G., & Tafti, R. A. (2015). Prediction of bulge height in warm hydroforming of aluminum tubes using ductile fracture criteria. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 15(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme. 2014.08.003
[12] He, Z., Yuan, S., Liu, G., Wu, J., & Cha, W. (2010). Formability testing of AZ31B magnesium alloy tube at elevated temperature. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210(6), 877-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.01.020
[13] Hashemi, S. J., Moslemi Naeini, H., Liaght, G. H., Shahbazi, J., & Roohi, A. H. (2015). Prediction of Bursting in Warm Tub Hydroforming using Modified Ductile Fracture Criteria. Modares Mechanical Engineering, 14(16) ,201 -211.
[14] Hwang, Y.-M., & Altan, T. (2002). FE simulations of the crushing of circular tubes into triangular cross-sections. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 125-126, 833-838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00385-0
[15] Hwang ,Y.-M., & Altan, T. (2003). Finite element analysis of tube hydroforming processes in a rectangular die. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 39(11), 1071-1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-874X(02)00157-9
[16] Nikhare, C., Weiss, M., & Hodgson, P. D .(2010) .Die closing force in low pressure tube hydroforming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 210(15), 2238-2244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.08.011
[17] Nikhare, C., Weiss, M., & Hodgson, P. D. (2017). Buckling in low pressure tube hydroforming. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 28, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.jmapro.2017.05.015
[18] Chu, G.-n., Lin, C.-y., Li, W., & Lin, Y.-l. (2018). Effect of internal pressure on springback during low pressure tube hydroforming. International Journal of Material Forming, 11(6), 855-866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1395-y
[19] Trott, A., & Nikhare, C. P. (2018). Effect of preform during low pressure tube hydroforming. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
[20] Zhang, X., Chu, G., He, J., & Yuan, S. (2019). Research on a hydro-pressing process of tubular parts in an open die. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 104(5), 2795-2803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03893-x